| Поле DC | Значення | Мова |
|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Anton Khriapynskyi, Ihor Khmyrov, Polina Aliieva, Borys Dziundziuk & Ivo Svoboda | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-12-26T14:32:28Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-12-26T14:32:28Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-09 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://repositsc.nuczu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/24318 | - |
| dc.description | Among the available academic research, a model is proposed that
addresses the problem of hybrid threats in four stages, namely: 1) analysis and
identification of hybrid threats; 2) designation and selection of tools; 3) building
up resilience and capacity; 4) assessment and evaluation (Filipec, 2021; Coldea,
2022). At the same time, a study of hybrid threats and counter-hybrid solutions
was carried out by analysing the state of affairs in Croatia, North Macedonia, and
Bosnia and Herzegovina. It was established that hybrid threats combine military
and non-military threats. Such threats include disinformation, cyberattacks,
economic pressure, the deployment of regular armed formations, and regular
forces (Mikac et al., 2022).
Pakistan Journal of Criminology 1039
The topic of safeguarding against hybrid threats in the realm of
cyberspace was thoroughly examined. It was concluded that it is necessary to
develop a novel conceptual framework for addressing hybrid threats, incorporating
tactics of deceit. Security initiatives predominantly concentrate on proactive
strategies designed to thwart malicious actors from breaching the network. These
applications attempt to use robust perimeters and endpoint protection by
recognising and blocking malicious activities to detect and stop attackers before
they can infiltrate (Steingartner et al., 2021; Lysenko et al., 2024).
The European Union has defined hybrid threats as diplomatic, military,
economic and technological measures to destabilise a political adversary. These
threats are one of the emerging security challenges in Europe and could shape the
continent’s future. According to EU policy, the primary responsibility for
countering them lies with the member states; that NATO’s role in ensuring
security in Europe positions it as a crucial ally in military and conventional
deterrence against hybrid threats (Lonardo, 2021).
The study of the definition of hybrid threats and the legal framework used
to counter such threats is noteworthy. Hybrid threats can cause serious damage to
basic infrastructure, making them an extremely powerful weapon in both peace
and wartime. Even so, such threats must be combated through the means of law,
as well as through prevention, resilience and education (Sanz-Caballero, 2023).
The strategies Finland, Germany, and the Netherlands employed in
addressing hybrid threats are examined, considering their strategic cultures. The
analysis reveals variations among the countries in their approaches to combating
hybrid threats, particularly regarding security infrastructure and the extent of
actions implemented to dissuade potential adversaries. These differences are
mainly rooted in historical, institutional and political processes (Wijnja, 2021).
Furthermore, involving civil society in addressing hybrid threats is
explored. The proactive engagement of civil society remains crucial in the joint
effort to strengthen societal resilience, including by “supporting information
pluralism, investing in civic awareness through education, and supporting an
independent press that responds quickly to any disinformation” (Kalniete &
Pildegovičs, 2021).
The examination of the potential resilience implementation in addressing
hybrid threats across infrastructure, digital, and social domains, utilising a
comprehensive, interdisciplinary, and government-wide strategy, is thorough and
extensive. It was determined that sustainability-based decision-making contributes
to problem-solving by analysing different digital systems’ nested
interdependencies and social sustainability (Vaseashta, 2022). | uk_UA |
| dc.description.abstract | The study aims to evaluate the involvement of public administration in
addressing hybrid threats in cyberspace. A comparative analysis was conducted on
the entities involved in combating hybrid threats in the digital realm in Ukraine,
France, and Japan, utilising visual and graphic techniques. It was established that
the prevalence of hybrid threats targeting the cyber domain is contingent upon
adequate organisational support. The subjects of public administration in
countering hybrid threats in cyberspace in Ukraine, France and Japan were
indicated. It was determined that hybrid threats predominantly encompass
challenges to a state’s sovereignty, national security, public awareness, classified
information, and communication. It is important to acknowledge many constantly
evolving tactics and strategies employed in these threats. At the same time, there
is potential to draw upon the experience of France and Japan and establish a
separate entity in Ukraine dedicated to countering hybrid threats in cyberspace.
Future research could explore the feasibility of implementing such a system in
Ukraine, highlighting the key tasks, goals, competencies, authorities, functions,
and operational objectives. | uk_UA |
| dc.language.iso | en | uk_UA |
| dc.publisher | Pakistan Journal of Criminology | uk_UA |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Vol. 16, No. 03, July—September 2024 (1037-1052); doi.org/10.62271/pjc.16.3.1037.1053 | - |
| dc.subject | public administration, hybrid threats, cyberspace, cyberattacks, national security | uk_UA |
| dc.title | The Role of Public Administration in Countering Hybrid Threats in Cyberspace | uk_UA |
| dc.type | Article | uk_UA |
| Розташовується у зібраннях: |
|
