Будь ласка, використовуйте цей ідентифікатор, щоб цитувати або посилатися на цей матеріал: http://repositsc.nuczu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/26181
Повний запис метаданих
Поле DCЗначенняМова
dc.contributor.authorSinkevych, Yevhen-
dc.contributor.authorHron, Victoria-
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-22T18:01:26Z-
dc.date.available2025-11-22T18:01:26Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationReview of Nationalities № 14/2024uk_UA
dc.identifier.issn2084-848X (print) 2543-9391 (on-line)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositsc.nuczu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/26181-
dc.descriptionThe goals set for implementation in the proposed research involve a comparative analysis of modern concepts of the theory of the nation in comparison with the classical interpretations of the Ukrainian school of political science of the 1920s.uk_UA
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the research is to reveal the essence of the nation as a complex socio-economic and spiritual-cultural phenomenon through a comparative analysis of modern and traditional approaches to the problems of social evolution of mankind. The research was carried out on the basis of the principles of systematicity, objectivity, comprehensiveness and historicism by applying the methods of analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, abstraction, analogies, as well as problematic, comparative and retrospective methods. From our point of view, modern Ukrainian social scientists, who in one way or another touch on the problems of nation building, are not familiar with the latest concepts of Western historical science. We are talking, in particular, about the ideas of one of the brightest researchers in the field of so-called transnational history, the Israeli futurologist Yuval Noah Harari. It is interesting to analyze his views in comparison with the opinions of Volodymyr Starosolskyi, a representative of the classical national school of political science, who, unfortunately, is also little known to the Ukrainian scientific community. A detailed study of the materials on the topic allows us to assert that the nation is not only a temporal phenomenon, but also to a large extent a spatial phenomenon. On the one hand, the nation and the national state arose as a political superstructure over the system of non-economic coercion and the transfer of knowledge, separated in the modern era into particular functions. On the other hand, we should speak about the unique experience of industrialization of the Euro-Atlantic zone, transferred to other regions in the process of transforming these regions into peripheral areas of the Western European market. Like any social thing, a nation goes through periods of nascent growth and transformation in its development. This process is accompanied by successive evolutionary changes in the mental sphere, the essence of which is the permanent expansion of the zone of consumption of man-made content due to the reduction of the zone of contact with the natural environment. In this way, there is a transition from customary to project methods of forming societies, and the paradigm of scientific understanding of the national phase of civilizational progress is also undergoing a transformation.uk_UA
dc.language.isoenuk_UA
dc.publisherOficyna Wydawnicza Uniwersyteut Zielonogorskiegouk_UA
dc.subjectnation, nation-state, democracy, traditional society, civilization, city, globalization.uk_UA
dc.titleThe evolution of the theory of nation-building: from Starosolsky to Harariuk_UA
dc.typeArticleuk_UA
Розташовується у зібраннях:

Файли цього матеріалу:
Файл Опис РозмірФормат 
Стаття Грон В..pdf16,21 MBAdobe PDFПереглянути/Відкрити


Усі матеріали в архіві електронних ресурсів захищені авторським правом, всі права збережені.