Будь ласка, використовуйте цей ідентифікатор, щоб цитувати або посилатися на цей матеріал:
http://repositsc.nuczu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/24318
Назва: | The Role of Public Administration in Countering Hybrid Threats in Cyberspace |
Автори: | Anton Khriapynskyi, Ihor Khmyrov, Polina Aliieva, Borys Dziundziuk & Ivo Svoboda |
Ключові слова: | public administration, hybrid threats, cyberspace, cyberattacks, national security |
Дата публікації: | вер-2024 |
Видавництво: | Pakistan Journal of Criminology |
Серія/номер: | Vol. 16, No. 03, July—September 2024 (1037-1052); doi.org/10.62271/pjc.16.3.1037.1053 |
Короткий огляд (реферат): | The study aims to evaluate the involvement of public administration in addressing hybrid threats in cyberspace. A comparative analysis was conducted on the entities involved in combating hybrid threats in the digital realm in Ukraine, France, and Japan, utilising visual and graphic techniques. It was established that the prevalence of hybrid threats targeting the cyber domain is contingent upon adequate organisational support. The subjects of public administration in countering hybrid threats in cyberspace in Ukraine, France and Japan were indicated. It was determined that hybrid threats predominantly encompass challenges to a state’s sovereignty, national security, public awareness, classified information, and communication. It is important to acknowledge many constantly evolving tactics and strategies employed in these threats. At the same time, there is potential to draw upon the experience of France and Japan and establish a separate entity in Ukraine dedicated to countering hybrid threats in cyberspace. Future research could explore the feasibility of implementing such a system in Ukraine, highlighting the key tasks, goals, competencies, authorities, functions, and operational objectives. |
Опис: | Among the available academic research, a model is proposed that addresses the problem of hybrid threats in four stages, namely: 1) analysis and identification of hybrid threats; 2) designation and selection of tools; 3) building up resilience and capacity; 4) assessment and evaluation (Filipec, 2021; Coldea, 2022). At the same time, a study of hybrid threats and counter-hybrid solutions was carried out by analysing the state of affairs in Croatia, North Macedonia, and Bosnia and Herzegovina. It was established that hybrid threats combine military and non-military threats. Such threats include disinformation, cyberattacks, economic pressure, the deployment of regular armed formations, and regular forces (Mikac et al., 2022). Pakistan Journal of Criminology 1039 The topic of safeguarding against hybrid threats in the realm of cyberspace was thoroughly examined. It was concluded that it is necessary to develop a novel conceptual framework for addressing hybrid threats, incorporating tactics of deceit. Security initiatives predominantly concentrate on proactive strategies designed to thwart malicious actors from breaching the network. These applications attempt to use robust perimeters and endpoint protection by recognising and blocking malicious activities to detect and stop attackers before they can infiltrate (Steingartner et al., 2021; Lysenko et al., 2024). The European Union has defined hybrid threats as diplomatic, military, economic and technological measures to destabilise a political adversary. These threats are one of the emerging security challenges in Europe and could shape the continent’s future. According to EU policy, the primary responsibility for countering them lies with the member states; that NATO’s role in ensuring security in Europe positions it as a crucial ally in military and conventional deterrence against hybrid threats (Lonardo, 2021). The study of the definition of hybrid threats and the legal framework used to counter such threats is noteworthy. Hybrid threats can cause serious damage to basic infrastructure, making them an extremely powerful weapon in both peace and wartime. Even so, such threats must be combated through the means of law, as well as through prevention, resilience and education (Sanz-Caballero, 2023). The strategies Finland, Germany, and the Netherlands employed in addressing hybrid threats are examined, considering their strategic cultures. The analysis reveals variations among the countries in their approaches to combating hybrid threats, particularly regarding security infrastructure and the extent of actions implemented to dissuade potential adversaries. These differences are mainly rooted in historical, institutional and political processes (Wijnja, 2021). Furthermore, involving civil society in addressing hybrid threats is explored. The proactive engagement of civil society remains crucial in the joint effort to strengthen societal resilience, including by “supporting information pluralism, investing in civic awareness through education, and supporting an independent press that responds quickly to any disinformation” (Kalniete & Pildegovičs, 2021). The examination of the potential resilience implementation in addressing hybrid threats across infrastructure, digital, and social domains, utilising a comprehensive, interdisciplinary, and government-wide strategy, is thorough and extensive. It was determined that sustainability-based decision-making contributes to problem-solving by analysing different digital systems’ nested interdependencies and social sustainability (Vaseashta, 2022). |
URI (Уніфікований ідентифікатор ресурсу): | http://repositsc.nuczu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/24318 |
Розташовується у зібраннях: |
Файли цього матеріалу:
Файл | Опис | Розмір | Формат | |
---|---|---|---|---|
67-The-Role-of-Public-Administration_09.2024.pdf | 540,77 kB | Adobe PDF | Переглянути/Відкрити |
Усі матеріали в архіві електронних ресурсів захищені авторським правом, всі права збережені.